Methods Background

Form an interdisciplinary team

The first step in developing and planning a physical activity and environment study is to form an interdisciplinary team. It is important that you work with experts in the following fields:

  • City/Urban planning
  • Transport
  • GIS
  • Architecture
  • Behavioral science
  • Policy makers
Much is made of the potentials and promises of Geographic Information System (GIS) database technologies, for example. GIS has been used with great success in physical activity and environment studies, both published and forthcoming. While GIS is a technology that produces excellent, objective data on environmental attributes, the challenge is to turn these data into meaningful information. This is where, particularly for behavioral scientists, epidemiologists and other ‘non-spatial’ researchers, collaborations with researchers from ‘spatial’ disciplines are crucial.

Studies to identify how environmental attributes influence physical activity will not succeed without the involvement of relevant research disciplines. In public health research, behavioral scientists, epidemiologists, demographers and experts from other disciplines have begun to study the spatial determinants of health-related behavioral choices. In transportation and urban planning, researchers from social geography, urban studies, architecture, transport engineering and other disciplines have carried out many studies on how urban form can influence active or inactive commuting choices. In leisure studies and related areas, researchers have built a broad body of knowledge, concepts and methods relating to active uses of leisure time in parks, on trails and in community facilities. These disciplines, with apparently diverse interests, are now coming together and finding new common ground.

A key objective of IPEN is to encourage the interdisciplinary linkages that will allow the best behavioral, social and spatial data to be gathered. Please tell us about your experiences of successful (or unsuccessful) networking so that we can develop a list of tips for IPEN members.

It is important that you learn a bit about each field so that you can ask pertinent questions. It is also important that you agree on common definitions and clearly explain key words and concepts from the start.

The recent Institute of Medicine and the Transportation Research Board special report “Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the Evidence” (2005) outlines some of the issues involved in transdisciplinary research and has a glossary of terms that may be useful. Downloadable from the following link: http://books.nap.edu/html/SR282/SR282.pdf

The following references may also help in understanding the nature of transdisciplinary research.

Theoretical approaches to the promotion of physical activity: Forging a transdisciplinary paradigm
King AC, Stokols D, Talen E, Brassington GS, Killingsworth R
American Journal of Preventive Medicine - August 2002 (Vol. 23, Issue 2 (Supplement 1), Pages 15-25)

Forging trandisciplinary bridges to meet the physical inactivity challenge in the 21st century
King AC, Bauman A, Abrams DB
American Journal of Preventive Medicine - August 2002 (Vol. 23, Issue 2 (Supplement 1), Pages 104-106)

The first Active Living Research Conference: Growth of a transdisciplinary field
Sallis JF, Linton L, Kraft M K
pages 93-95

The public health roots of zoning: In search of active living’s legal genealogy
Schilling J, Linton LS
pages 96-104

Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults
Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC
pages 105-116

Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ
Frank LD, Schmid TL, Sallis JF, Chapman J, Saelens BE
pages 117-125

From walkability to active living potential: An “ecometric” validation study
Gauvin L, Richard L, Craig CL, Spivock M, Riva M, Forster M, Laforest S, Laberge S, Fournel MC, Gagnon H, Gagné S, Potvin L
pages 126-133

Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation: Urban form changes and children’s active transportation to school
Boarnet MG, Anderson CL, Day K, McMillan T, Alfonzo M
pages 134-140

Economics and physical activity: A research agenda
Sturm R
pages 141-149

Contributions of leisure studies and recreation and park management research to the active living agenda
Godbey GC, Caldwell LL, Floyd M, Payne LL
pages 150-158

The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model
Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA
pages 159-168

Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?
Giles-Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, Collins C, Douglas K, Ng K, Lange A, Donovan RJ
pages 169-176

Evaluating change in physical activity with the building of a multi-use trail
Evenson KR, Herring AH, Huston SL
pages 177-185

Influences of building design and site design on physical activity: Research and intervention opportunities
Zimring C, Joseph A, Nicoll GL, Tsepas S
pages 186-193

Preventing childhood obesity: A solution-oriented research paradigm
Robinson TN, Sirard JR
pages 194-201

In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research
Stokols D, Harvey R, Gress J, Fuqua J, Phillips K
pages 202-213

Active living research and the urban design, planning, and transportation disciplines
Vernez Moudon A
pages 214-215

Land use, the built environment, and physical activity: A public health mixture; a public health solution
Powell KE
pages 216-217

Commentary on active living research
Jackson RJ
pages 218-219

Other Methods Backgrounds

Build on studies from other countries Collaboration Form an interdisciplinary team Starting with GIS Walkability